My
most recent tour to the Upper Lagoon was an exercise in snatching partial
victory from the jaws of defeat. On
trips to the Upper Lagoon, we paddle through a tidally-influenced channel that
only permits travel up to Pedersen Glacier around certain high tides. (Usually, the channel carries the glacier’s
meltwater downstream to the bay. But on
some high tides, the level of the sea rises enough that the stream actually
reverses directions – instead of fresh water flowing downstream, it’s salt
water flowing uphill.) This particular
tide height was only 7.6, (we like to run at 8 feet or higher), so it was sort
of a marginal high tide to begin with.
Additionally, we only had two people sign up for the trip, which is a
good thing in some respects (guiding trips become progressively easier the fewer
clients there are), but it meant that we needed to paddle up in kayaks. Three people (myself and the clients) are
simply not enough people to effectively paddle an eight-person canoe. Unfortunately, tours in kayaks require a lot
more time at the beginning of the trip to get everyone dressed in their spray
skirts and cover the safety points about the boats. So, that was two strikes against the trip
going as planned. The third strike came
in the form of one of the slowest client paddling speeds that I have yet seen
this summer. (Some beginning kayakers
do not immediately make the connection that in order to propel a boat through
the water, you need to actually encounter some resistance against your paddle. Some clients get their paddle wet, and not
much else.) The combination of a
marginal tide, a late start, and a slow paddling speed made an unfortunate
trifecta; by the time we reached the tidal channel, it was already a half an
hour past the posted high tide. For
reasons I don’t fully understand, the tides in the lagoon can be delayed up to
two hours from the posted Seward tides - however, this wasn’t a high enough
tide for the water to stack up like that.
By the tie we got to the channel, the current had already reversed, and
was flowing downstream, opposite the way we wanted to go.
I
pulled out my tow rope, clipped my clients’ boat onto a ten-foot tether and
started paddling for all I was worth.
With the weight of the double kayak, plus the fact that the current was
heading the other direction, it was definitely a workout. We inched our way into the channel. After a few minute, we pulled far enough
ahead of a low take-out on the opposite bank where we could potentially land
the kayaks on shore. I hollered to my
clients that we probably weren’t going to be able to make it much further in
(mostly because I knew that I was going to run out of steam eventually, and
also that I didn’t know how great a tour experience my clients would have if
the whole tour was just inch-by-inch progress up the channel…) They seemed good with the change in plan, so
we turned and ferried across the channel to the opposite bank.
One
confession: I didn’t quite know how landing two kayaks in current, and with a
boat on a tow, would actually work. I had visions of getting my kayak into shore, then
having to stop paddling to get out of my boat, and subsequently being dragged
back into the water by the weight of the boat I was towing. So I asked my people to paddle hard into
shore and try to beach their boats as much as they could; which they did pretty
well. There was slack on the rope as I
was getting out; then I pulled their kayak further up the bank and helped them
climb out. Not nearly as dramatic as I
had expected.
Once
we were on shore, we walked about 70 yards up the bank to a place where we could see the upper lagoon,
and get views of all the grounded icebergs at the front of Pedersen
Glacier. I felt very sorry for one of
the clients, who had problems with her feet, and was having trouble walking in
the rubber boots. On the plus side,
since it was just the three of us, we were really able to tailor the trip
around what they were interested in doing.
So we walked out to the shore, took some pictures, and walked back. This is another reason why tours with just a
few clients are wonderful; its much easier to manage unexpected situations when
there are fewer people to keep track of.
The
next day was good; it was a five-bear day.
The first bear was grazing in the meadow as we were setting up boats for
our morning trips. The second and third
bears were seen distantly as we were paddling across the lagoon for the morning
canoe and hiking tour. The third and
fourth bears were a double feature for the afternoon canoe trip.
There
is one bear around the lodge that we can recognize by sight, thanks to a large
brown saddle mark on his rear end. This
brown spot has earned the bear the name Cinnamon Bun. Cinnamon Bun has occasionally been seen
hanging out with another bear; we wonder if the bears are litter-mates, as they
don’t seem to act much like a male/female pair.
Anyway,
Cinnamon Bun and the other bear were both on the shore of the lagoon, vacuuming
up the plantago that grows near the high-tide line. It was very clear from watching them who was
the dominant bear. Cinnamon Bun was
just mowing the grass; he didn’t seem to care what the other bear was
doing. The little bear, on the other
hand, was paying very close attention to Cinnamon Bun. Every
time Cinnamon Bun moved closer, the little bear would stop eating and take a
few steps further away, and stare at Cinnamon Bun for a few seconds before
going back to eating. Eventually,
Cinnamon Bun started moving purposefully along the beach in the direction of
the other bear; the little guy got
spooked. He loped up the beach and
disappeared into the greenery, while Cinnamon Bun continued walking along and
cropping plants.
The next day, strangely,
none of our guests wanted to go on any trips in the afternoon. This turned out to be a good thing, as the best wildlife
sightings of the day all took place inside the guest cabins.
The
guests in cabin eight had gone back to their room after lunch, and were taking
a nap. They woke up in a hurry when a
squirrel jumped in bed with them. Within
the hour, ermine were reported breaking into two other cabins (apparently
they’d been taking clues from the squirrels).
The ermine look like tiny brown ferrets; they might appear cute, but they
are also carnivorous murderers. One of the ermine had drug a dead vole into
the cabin with it; it apparently wanted to stockpile some food in their
bed. From the refuge of some high furniture, the
clients took photos with their iPad of the ermine ransacking
their room. At the bar that night,
everyone was sharing pictures they’d taken of ermine and squirrels climbing bedframes,
chewing gloves, and scurrying in and out of cracks in the walls. Two of the lodge staff were kept busy for a
couple of hours chasing the wildlife out of the cabins, and crawling under the
buildings with cans of spray-foam insulation, trying to identify and plug up their
access routes. The lodge manager comp’ed
a bottle of wine to everyone who had had their room infested, and everyone
seemed pretty happy with their up-close-and-personal Alaska wildlife encounter.
In other animal news, the camp porcupine got
into the maintenance shed last week and chewed up a tube of silicone gel. The porcupine was seen waddling out of camp
with orange goo smeared all over his face. We suspect he was probably high as a kite on glue fumes. The maintenance staff are now talking about
trying to live-trap and relocate the porcupine to the other side of the lagoon,
to save our silicone gels from further destruction, and possibly to save the
porcupine from ingesting more chemicals than are good for him.
I
saw the porcupine a few days later on the ridge; we walked behind him for about
seventy-five yards taking pictures. He
knew we were behind him, but the brush was so thick that he couldn’t get off
the trail, or didn’t want to bother.
Instead, he’d turn around, give us a dirty look, and waddle faster down
the trail. Eventually, he dove into the
bushes, shaking his quills ominously as we passed.
Thanks! Interesting ass ever!
ReplyDelete